MS
Purchasing FairResourcesNewsMetal Specs
search
Find Metal Stamping companies     
Find Metal Fabricating companies
Find Slide Forming companies
Find Spring Coiling companies
Find Metal Spinning companies
Find Custom Rolling companies
Find Hydroforming companies
Find Small-Lot Stamping companies
Find Washer Manufacturing companies
Find Tool and Die companies
Search by markets
search by country
search all manufacturers
 

PMA Members - Update your
company profile


Chapter 13 - Design Considerations for Spot Welding

Spot welding is often selected for joining sheet metal fabrications, stampings and assemblies because it is fast, reliable and economical. However, numerous design considerations can affect the quality and cost of the weld, among them: size of the spot weld, accessibility, positioning, materials and thicknesses being joined, and the number of spots needed to attain the desired strength.

Fig.1

Figure 1. In resistance spot and projection welding, two sheet metal parts under pressure are heated by electrical resistance, melting the metal and forming a weld "nugget." Circular in shape in a plan view, the nugget has an oblong cross-section that, ideally, penetrates both thicknesses almost equally.

This section will focus primarily on resistance spot welding (RSW) and resistance projection welding (RPW) since these processes are most commonly used due to their speed and flexibility. See Figure 1, for schematics of RSW and RPW.

Applications include attachment of reinforcing braces and stiffeners, functional brackets, hinges and other parts. Often, spot welding is the method of choice for assembly of entire enclosures, cabinets and multipart assemblies.

Thickness of the majority of parts joined by spot welding ranges up to 1/8 in. (3 mm) for each member, although parts up to 1/4 in. (6 mm) thick have been successfully spot welded.

General Design Considerations

Based on the experience of stampers and fabricators, certain general recommendations can facilitate spot welding of a sheet metal design, no matter what metalforming process is used to make it. It is always useful to consult with the metalformer in the design stage when questions arise regarding the part design, application of spot welding or, control of spot welding cost for a particular design.

Knowledgeable designers avoid overspecifying the number of welds, weld size, and location. After evaluating strength requirements, it usually suffices to specify "a minimum number of spot welds equally spaced," thereby leaving the most economical positioning up to the metalformer.

Even though spot welding is a very costeffective way of fastening sheet materials, if other joining methods are also specified, it may be more economical to redesign so that one or the other method is eliminated.

Dimensional precision is often overspecified, sometimes unintentionally. CAD systems, for example, specify three or four digits of precision unless instructed otherwise. Where possible, spot welding should be shown schematically without dimensions.

Weld Size and Strength

Weld size (nugget diameter) is typically slightly less than the diameter of the impression the electrode creates on the material. These dimensions and other spot welding parameters are given in Table I for aluminum, carbon and stainless steel. For simplicity, such standards can be specified by the designer as the controlling print information on spot welds.

Base metal strength and spot weld strength are interrelated. Table I gives realistic strength expectations for design purposes. For economy, avoid over-specification of welds.

In applications where space is limited, specifying one weld can produce a stronger bond than two spots, which may be limited in size and integrity because of contraints in positioning, accessibility and shunting effects (current loss).

Typically, diameters of spot welds range from about 1/8 in. (3 mm) to l/2 in. (13 mm) depending on the thicknesses of the workpieces and the material. When the size of spot welds is designated, the designer should specify only one size throughout an assembly in the interest of manufacturing economy and total part cost.

Weldability of Materials

Low carbon steel is one of the most readily spot welded materials, as well as being the most commonly used material for stampings and fabrications. It can be spot welded to many ferrous and non-ferrous alloys with varying success, depending on the combination of metals joined.

Higher carbon and low-alloy steels can also be spot welded, although with reservations, because of a tendency to form harder welds, which may degrade weld performance. As carbon content increases, so does brittleness, with an associated propensity for cracking and weld separation.

In addition, higher strength steels may require special techniques or treatments like tempering after welding. Spot weldability of HSLA (high-strength low-alloy) steels is directly related to composition and type of microalloying elements. It is advisable to check with the supplier before specifying spot welding here.

Stainless steels are spot weldable, some grades more readily than others. Austenitic grades of the 300 series are the most commonly welded types, followed by ferritic. Martensitic stainlesses are the least common because welded joints are always much more brittle. All stainless steels require careful adjustment of welding parameters and/or special methods to obtain optimum quality welds.

Highly conductive materials like aluminum require very high power to form quality spot welds. However aluminum alloys are routinely spot welded (see Table I for weldability). Here, cleanliness is much more of a concern than with low-carbon steels because of aluminum's rapid surface oxidation characteristics.

For optimum quality and weld performance, expensive cleaning procedures to remove surface oxide are required. For demanding applications, equipment to monitor surface resistivity from lot to lot is necessary to assure consistency of quality.

This leads to a related consideration. If aluminum has been chosen for an important reason, such as lightweight or high strength-to-weight ratio, the added expense of ensuring a high-quality weld should be justified. If it has not, re-evaluation of the original material selection is in order or, perhaps, another assembling method should be considered.

Spot welding of very dissimilar metals, such as aluminum and steel, is generally not possible because of different melting characteristics and conductivities.

Some types of coated low-carbon steels require special techniques. Steels plated with chrome and nickel for electrical conductivity can usually be resistance welded as readily as uncoated material. Aluminum, tin, zinc and terne-coated steels are also spot weldable with special precautions and welding equipment.

Some coatings can emit poisonous fumes that must be safely handled when spot welded, thereby increasing cost. Spot welding of coated substrates creates burn marks in the coating which can be unsightly and may corrode in severe environments. Designers should carefully consider the product's appearance and service requirements before specifying spot welding of pre-plated materials.

Thickness of Mating Parts

Ideally, equal thicknesses of two sheet metal parts to be joined produces an evenly distributed weld nugget within the two layers. When this is not practical, materials of different thicknesses can also be joined and produce a centered weld nugget by using a larger electrode on the thicker member.

At a ratio above about 3-to-1 (thickest to thinnest member), spot welding becomes difficult. At this point, another joining method should be considered--for example, projection welding.

Note that weld deformation is always greater on the thinner member. For this reason, stiffeners and brackets spot welded to cosmetic parts should be thinner than or equal in thickness to the exposed surface material.

Weld Proximity and Spacing

Recommended spacing between welds and distances from a spot weld to component edges and other part features should be followed to obtain optimum weld quality and strength.

  • Weld-to-weld spacing should be a minimum of 10 material thicknesses. For 0.060 sheet steel, that's about 0.6 in. (15 mm). Ideally, 20 times material thickness is recommended to reduce shunting effects with a minimum spacing of 1/2 in. (13 mm). See Table I for minimum and recommended weld spacing for various material thickness of aluminum, carbon and stainless steel.
  • Weld-to-edge distance should also conform to a minimum dimension that is a function of the weld diameter. Generally, the center of a spot weld (its location point) is positioned one to two diameters away from the edge of the part being welded or from a feature in the part being welded depending on thickness of material (Figure 2).



Figure 2. Recommended minimum spacing between spot welds and edges of parts to be joined also applies to slots and holes in the workpieces.

If this minimum-dimension requirement is not followed, a poor-quality weld, distortion of the parts being joined, or no weld at all may result. See Figures 3, 4 and 5.


Figure 3. Improper weld. Excess metal has been expelled from the weld causing the weld to deform due to excessive indentation and surface cracks.


Figure 4. Existence of deep pits is cause for rejection, as are cracks and burned metal in the weld.


Figure 5. Excessive edge bulge, which caused weld and base metal to crack, leads to a rejectable weld.

  • Weld-to-form spacing should be a minimum of one bend radius plus the spot diameter so that the electrodes can make proper contact with the surfaces being joined without shunting to the adjacent wall (Figure 6).


Figure 6. When a part incorporating a formed feature like a bend is joined to another sheet metal part, sufficient clearance must be maintained to form a quality spot weld.

Positioning and Accessibility

If possible, spot welding of sheet metal components should be restricted to joining flat, coplanar surfaces. Spot welding for assembly of mating parts in multiple planes should be limited to parts smaller than a "bread box" that are easy to handle.

With large, heavy parts, another fastening method, welding process or possibly a redesign should be considered unless production quantities support the initial expense of specialized spot welding equipment.


Figure 7. Specifying spot welds on short flanges could make access nearly impossible.

Although single- and double-bend electrode tips are available to reach confined weld locations, a small flange dimension may restrict access, and thereby prevent a successful spot weld. Such is the case with C-shaped parts or U-shaped channels with short flanges (Figure 7). For instance, specifying a 1/4 in. (6 mm) diameter weld on a 3/8 in. (10 mm) flange not only violates spacing considerations, but also makes it very difficult for the operator to access the weld location.

Cosmetics

Good design practices attempt to limit spot welding on appearance or cosmetic surfaces. While textured paints can be used to hide small electrode marks on finished surfaces, grinding, or filling and grinding, is often required and can double the cost of the welding operation.

Often, structural elements such as stiffeners are required to reinforce large cosmetic surfaces. For these applications, designers should select material which is thinner than the material from which the appearance part is fabricated. This assures that weld shrinkage will occur on the noncosmetic part which helps to control the cost of filling and abrasive finishing.

Plating Spot Welded Parts

Spot welding creates overlapping seams which, when immersed in electroplating solutions, trap solution residues through capillary action. This creates two problems. First, the residue often leaves plating salt deposits which are unsightly and which, in extreme cases, may require touch up or manual removal at increased cost. Second, the metal in the seam is unprotected and can corrode severely in harsh environments.

When designing spot welded assemblies for electroplating, consideration must be given to plating drainage, enclosed seams and pockets, overlapping seams and other areas where solutions may be trapped or where special cleaning or processing techniques may be required. When these operations are combined, early consultation with an experienced supplier is crucial.

Spot Welded Fasteners

Weld nuts and weld studs are commonly used to provide a means for subsequent fastening of additional components and assemblies, or for periodic removal of service parts for maintenance and repair. When specifying welded fasteners, care should be taken not to tightly tolerance concentricity or perpendicularity to a datum plane, since this drastically increases cost. Weld fasteners located by holes punched by prior stamping operations are an accurate and generally preferred location method.

For maximum cost-effectiveness, select weld nuts and studs of one size that will be used throughout the assembly. This helps to keep set-ups to a minimum and increases manufacturing throughput.

Nuts located by holes are typically within 0.006 (0.15 mm) of the original hole location. Studs can be located to 0.020 (0.51 mm) with simple fixturing. Closer tolerances require more sophisticated and costly fixtures.

Positive Location of Workpieces

Precise locations of spot welded parts is a cost-related process and should be considered during the design. Part positioning involves either extensive fixturing or, preferably, selfalignment through built-in stamped features like holes and tabs. With the latter method, the location is predetermined by the accuracy of alignment features.


Figure 8. Half shear or extruded button, with their mating holes, can accurately align components for spot welds where tolerances are important.

The most preferred and most easily achieved method for accurately self-fixturing parts is the half sheared or extruded cylindrical button and matching hole in the mating part. (Figure 8). One mating hole should be 0.003 in. (0.08 mm) larger in diameter than the extrusion and the second hole should be slotted by 0.040 in. (1.02 mm) minimum to allow for normal fabrication tolerances as shown in the drawing. Another alternative is to produce a lanced tab in a punching process. Mating parts can then be brought up to it and located in position.

Knowledgeable designers recognize such cost-saving and quality-improvement methods and specify them in the manufacturing process. The consistency attainable with such methods surpasses that of sophisticated jigs and fixtures but the greatest value is the cost efficiency. Additionally, these techniques can be used for fillet welding applications, and mechanical assemblies.

Projection Welding

A refinement of resistance spot welding is resistance projection welding (RPW). It makes use of projections previously formed on the workpiece to reduce the power required to make a resistance weld. Consequently, multiple welds can be made more easily at the same time, and thicker sections can be joined more readily than in RSW. Other advantages include reduced shunting effects, closer weld-to-weld spacing and welding of workpieces with smaller flanges.

Projection welding can be used on low-carbon, low-alloy and stainless steels, as well as on aluminum. Typically, thicknesses up to 0.125 in. (3.18 mm) can be joined. Thin workpieces--from 0.010 in. (0.25 mm) up to 0.022 in. (0.56 mm)--may require special equipment. Below 0.010 in. (0.25 mm), resistance spot welding is recommended, because on this thin material the projections would collapse before the fusion temperature is reached.


Figure 9. Button-and cone-type welding projections and typical dimensions.

The two major types of welding projections appear in Figure 9, along with commonly used projection sizes, which are normally based on the thickness of the thinner material to be welded. In general, projections should be positioned as shown in Figure 10 to optimize strength and accessibility.


Figure 10. Recommended positioning for projection welds made on various thicknesses of sheet metal.

While projection welding can be less expensive than resistance spot welding, workpiece alignment is more critical, and heights of projections with simultaneous welds need to be closely controlled-- typically, within 0.003 in. (0.08 mm) of each other.

Tolerance Considerations

Required restrictive tolerances should be indicated on the part drawing, while less important dimensions should be designated with appropriately relaxed tolerances. One way to do this is to expand the tolerance block on drawings by including:

English Units
.X 0.100 (2.54 mm)
.XX 0.020 (0.5l mm) (dedicated tools)
.XX 0.030 (0.76 mm) (universal tools)
.XXX 0.010 (0.25 mm)


Figure 11. Recommended method for specifying spot welds and projection welds.

When specifying attachment of structural parts such as stiffeners use the most liberal tolerance (X 0.100), since this reduces or eliminates fixturing costs for such unimportant dimensions. Critical dimensions, for such details as hole diameters, coplanar hole-to-hole spacing, etc., should be separately toleranced.

Established by the American Welding Society (AWS), the recommended method for specifying resistance spot welds and projection welds appears in Figure 11.


Go to the Design Guidelines Overview
Go to the Glossary

Excerpt taken from Design Guidelines for Metal Stampings and Fabrications -- 2nd Edition copyright © 1995 Precision Metalforming Association

Purchase the new Third Edition of Design Guidelines for Metal Stampings and Fabrications copyright © 2004 Precision Metalforming Association at Marketplace today!

 

 



PMAPrecision Metalforming Association, 6363 Oak Tree Blvd., Independence, OH 44131-2500 
Phone: 216-901-8800 — Fax: 216-901-9190 
copyright 2006
Precision Metalforming Association   All Rights Reserved   Legal Page    Privacy Policy